Join us on

Eye On Iran: U.S. Circulates New Draft Proposal for Iran Sanctions

Eye On Iran: U.S. Circulates New Draft Proposal for Iran Sanctions

Did You Know? "During 1980-88, Iran fought a bloody, indecisive war with Iraq that eventually expanded into the Persian Gulf and led to clashes between US Navy and Iranian military forces between 1987 and 1988," according to the CIA World Factbook. http://bit.ly/8nkJJ3

Top Stories

NYT: "The United States is circulating a draft of new, tougher sanctions against Iran that concentrate on the banking, shipping and insurance sectors of Iran's economy and is now waiting for China and Russia to signal that they are willing to start negotiating over the measures, United Nations Security Council diplomats said Wednesday." http://nyti.ms/cg4Zs0
 
WSJ: "The Obama administration, still struggling to win China's pivotal backing for a new round of United Nations sanctions against Iran, is increasingly worried about gaining the support of some other members of the U.N. Security Council, particularly Brazil, Turkey and Lebanon, according to U.S. and European officials." http://bit.ly/c54zE6
 
CS Monitor: "Brazil rebuffed Ms. Clinton's efforts to win support for more sanctions on Iran's nuclear program.  Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim told reporters Wednesday that Brazil wanted two or three months' more negotiation with Iran.  'We still have some possibility of coming to an agreement ... but that may require a lot of flexibility on both sides,' he said, with Clinton present. 'We will not simply bow down to the evolving consensus if we do not agree.'" http://bit.ly/bGdpOO
 

Iran Disclosure Project

Nuclear Program

WP: "Here is a guide to the key players among U.N. ambassadors who will be negotiating what Washington hopes will be the fourth round of sanctions." http://bit.ly/cRzTUn
 
Radio Farda: "Impossible? Not really. Granted, if your country is a signatory of the Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), as most countries are, the constraints on your bomb building are considerable. Inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) are difficult to circumvent. And the IAEA can no longer be fooled as easily as in the 1980s, when it failed to uncover Saddam Hussein's military nuclear program in Iraq despite regular inspections." http://bit.ly/b8efts
 
WP: "Iran came under renewed attack Wednesday for its decision to make a higher grade of enriched uranium, a move that weapons experts say would dramatically shorten the country's path to nuclear weapons." http://bit.ly/cBhjNL

Commerce
 
Bloomberg: "The New York-based group United Against Nuclear Iran has stepped up pressure on companies to sever ties to Iran, including business unrelated to its nuclear program. Peoria, Illinois-based Caterpillar Inc., Munich-based Siemens AG and The Woodlands, Texas-based Huntsman Corp. have announced that they or their subsidiaries would no longer do business in Iran." http://bit.ly/bn85vT
 
Reuters: "UANI sent a four-page letter on Tuesday to Ingersoll Chief Executive Mike Lamach detailing what it calls 'extensive dealings' in Iran, which argues that conducting business in Iran violates the company's code of conduct.  At issue are air compressors used in industrial plants run by the state-owned National Iranian Oil Company, according to the letter." http://bit.ly/cy43g2

Human Rights

AP: "U.N. human rights chief Navi Pillay has singled out Iran for its crackdown on protestors after last year's election in an address at the U.N. Human Rights Council.  Pillay said human rights are 'deteriorating' in Iran and that she is deeply concerned." http://nyti.ms/cSTyHf

Opinion

Walter Russell Mead in American Interest: "Living with a nuclear Iran won't be fun, but it's better than the alternatives, so let's start making plans for the inevitable.  I actually agree with O'Hanlon and Reid that military strikes against the Iranian nuclear program aren't likely to get us anywhere good, but that doesn't mean we can stop thinking about them." http://bit.ly/bnMoqL